Wednesday, February 08, 2006

danish boycott will it work?

well according to me the whole issue has been blown out of proportion. yes i agree that a particular religion should noit be branded with wrongful adjectives that spark emotional outburst's amongst its sollowers. clearly they were wrong in publishing the photos but first amendment rights and freedom of press and free speech should not be compromised to keep people not even living the country the article was published happy. so overall the danish newspaper was wrong in doing what they did but equal blame should go on the fanatical muslims which is by the way a very small population in the world for over-reacting with violence as their key, what ever happened to peacefull demonstrations, you dont see violent demonstrations when hindu gods or christ is printed on shoe soles and other obscene places.. i think a boycott of this nature will not work as most people in the world have gotten used to luxury danish goods and i belive when this controversy cools down, the same very people that are [protesting will be the first to use them again, i heard the same calls for boycott of americaN GOODS when they invaded iraq, what happened, everyone still drinks coke and pepsi. i think we should not get involved in this mess and take a back seat and wait for it to cool down.

thank you

pleasant reading

sidd

Friday, February 03, 2006

google's selout

well first of all i am extremely shocked at the decision by goolge to agree to such a proposal in the first place. keeping in mind that it is the second biggest technology companyin the UNITED STATES after Microsoft, i would have thought that Google would have folowed its business principles according to many of the democratic practices that stands for the American dream. Google being American should have acted more ethically and rejected this proposal in the first place as it violates the first amendment rights of the very country they exist in. the whole deal sounds as if Google is insecure of its future and accepting such a deal now according to them will only stabalize their position in the market. quiet frankly they are running scared that one of their big competitors would bag this deal and they would eventually lose out in the long run. according to the article written by Thomas Lipscomb, google would have to "actively assist the Chinese government in barring access to thousands of Web sites and search terms that the Chinese feel might destablize its authoritarian government.". This totally shows us that google would go to any extent to make an extra buck or two and would not stand for what is right, that is freedom of speech and Privacy, which is again funny because Google is at loggerheads with the US government on the above issues regarding child pornography. concluding i would just like to say that Google should not cooperate with a government where they do not know the meaning of democracy and should act ethically and refuse to coperate as they are doing with the US government.

siddharth sudhakar